'Conflict English Essay\r'

'ESSAY PLAN CONFLICT †SHOULD I PURCHASE A 1940S GENUINE MINK pelt COAT OR NOT? Opening parity †browsing Ebay, personalized dilemma all(a) over ethics, terra firma below my personal argue for and against grease ones palms and founder of said coat FOR wight is dead †(dead over 70 yrs), non slaughtered for me, mink farms dont exist all more, cant save them now * timeless and classic magical spell †should be enjoyed so travail it, take vex of it, penning of history * cost effective grease ones palms from ebay †move over to go abroad to get this gunpoint (eastern europe), cost of shipping, worry, uncertainty, grease ones palms not protect interchangeable on ebay * its recycling †why destroy fragment of art, left in dusty warehouse, eat by vermin, so enjoy trade, coat hand crafted, more hours work * cant buy something equivalent this today †character abroad for similar * warm and rattling(a) †eskimos breach off documentary pelt, we dont get that type of weather, savors second to none, quality, judgment, eat which is seldom seen nowa days * statement plunk †unique, never a coat like this, proud and honoured to wear it, exquisite AGAINST ethically wrong †slaughter for decorative is groundless, educated people shouldnt wear it * target for activistic †eg, support of paint thr induce at a woman * may come along other to wear substantive skin †could in increase market place interest eg stoles, hats etc, may lead to a ‘ pitch-dark market trade * may be olfactory perceptiony †factual fur has a certain smell, stinks when wet, rains a shell out in UK, wet dog (yuk) * only an motive piece †not dim daily, kept locked away, no max enjoyment, scared to wear it * conclusion †didnt buy, would feel uncomfortable in myself, dearly loved to own a piece of history, conscience wont allow, olden days this coiffure was common not now, made and worn in an date o f reference where there were no animal rights activist, cant take a life to drape ourselves, its a selfish and barbaric act to wear one. headspring GCSE LEVEL (GRADED A*) The web host of a creative typography website approaches you to submit some writing for it. This month’s theme is â€Å"Conflict”. You put one over complete freedom in your choice of form, simply are asked not to make what you submit long-life than 1,000 words. Write your piece for the website. CONFLICT â€Å"Should I secure a 1940’s genuine mink fur coat or not? ” Recently I was browsing ‘eBay’ on the internet looking for a winter coat when I came across the above. I bid for the item and then began a personal dilemma over the ethics of whether or not I should own a coat much(prenominal) as this.Below is my own personal argument as to whether or not I should indeed purchase and wear a real fur coat. logical argument for purchase * The animal is dead; in even offt it has been dead for over 70 years. The mink has not been slaughtered for my pleasure alone and mink farms no lengthy exist in this country. No matter what I do, I cannot save it now. * It is a timeless and definitive garment and should be enjoyed. The only way to do this is to wear it, take care of the item and rate the fact that I own a piece of history. * It is recycling †what is the point of destroying a beautiful piece of ‘art’. Do you leave the coat in a dusty warehouse to be eaten by rats or mice, or do you enjoy the craftsmanship and work of art?These coats were hand crafted and took umpteen, many hours/weeks to complete. * It would be very cost effective to purchase a fur coat from eBay. If I were serious almost purchasing real fur, I would probably withdraw to go abroad, say Eastern Europe, to source such(prenominal) an item. Then there is the cost of shipping and in like manner the worry of buying from an unknown source. I may not be protected in my purchase like I forget be with eBay. * I will never find a garment like this in a shop nowadays. Again, I would have to source the item most probably abroad and there are too many uncertainties. * It will be warm and feel luxurious to the touch. Eskimos wear real fur to eep themselves warm and although England doesn’t experience weather such as theirs, it will still keep the chill at bay. overly the feel of real fur is second to none. It has quality, depth and a finish on the garment that is rarely seen on mass produced items that are manufactured today. * It is a statement piece, and unique, there will never be another coat like this, ever and I would feel proud and honoured to wear such a garment as exquisite as this. production line against purchase * It is ethically wrong. Slaughtering animal for cosmetic purposed is barbaric and as an educated individual I do not stand for much by wear such a garment. * I may cause a target for activist.For example, I once exam ine in the newspapers that a woman who was tiring a real fur coat had a tin of paint thrown over her. * It may encourage others to wear real fur and this in rescind could create a market for garments such as real fur stoles, hats, jackets etc. It may even create a ‘black market’ for real fur items. * I believe real fur has a certain ‘smell’ to it, made in particular prominent when wet. I do not like the idea of being caught in the rain wearing the coat only to find I smell like a wet dog. Also it rains all the time in England! * It would be an occasion piece. I would certainly not wear it daily, therefore would I get maximum enjoyment out of it? Would I be in fear of wearing it? Would it turn back up just sat in the insistence?Therefore, in conclusion to my personal conflict, I pertinacious not go through with the purchase. I snarl I would not be comfortable, in myself, wearing this coat. I would have dearly loved to have owned this piece of history , but my conscience would not allow it. In times gone by, garments of this constitution were common place amongst the wealthy and in an era where animal rights activist were virtually unheard of; real fur coats were not an issue. Nowadays, many of us shoot ourselves equal to animals and that we should not take their lives just to adorn our own bodies. In my opinion, this would indeed be considered a selfish and barbaric act. (707 words)\r\n'