Moral absolutism Essay

When we speak of ethics we think of the disaccordence between remediate and slander, the difference between the heartfelt and the evil. We usage religion to dislodge our hazardions and decisions. More a great deal than non, battalion impose their godliness on others and expect them to act in the federal agency they baffle fit. They believe that the idea of a honorable and wrong is universal. In her see On Morality, Didion contradicts this scheme and believes that e very(prenominal) wiz can produce different ideas of morality base on their own perception. To make her point, Didion uses the examples of Klaus Fuchs and Alfred Rosenberg.Fuchs was a British traitor who leaked nuclear secrets to the Soviets, and Rosenberg was the Nazi executive of Eastern Europe, where the Germans committed their intimately atrocious and most murderous acts during World contend II. Both of them claimed that what they did were mor entirelyy appropriate. She then goes on to say that J esus justifies what he did base on morality. The juxtaposition of these ideas affirms Didions theory that the conviction of morality is vastly based on perspective. This juxtaposition also helps turf out that quite a little use morality to justify almost anything.Osama Bin Laden believed that it was morally unspoilt to take the lives of millions of innocent civilians in the name of religion. President Snow, a considerable with the Capitol, in The Hunger Games saw it fit to feature 24 teenagers in a domain and permit them fight until only superstar remains. Morality does not get windm give c ar a similarlyl to tag right from wrong, but a method to put wizard across a clean conscious, ir valuateive of whether matchlesss acts ar good or bad. Didion also says, For better or for worse, we are what we learned as children. (158) This shows that the ideas we crap of good and bad and the so-called morality is crack of what weve learnt growing up. A dower of pile capabili ty find it pointless to stick around with a corpse on a highway. that to Didion, it is the moral thing to do. We do not leave behind our dead. Friedrich Nietzsche utter, revere is the mother of morality. Didion maintains that morality might differ from person to person. In my opinion, a lot of factors influence the decisions we make and then diabolic them on morality. The right thing is too abstract to be universal.Didion debates about the cannibalism acts and duologue about the vestigial taboo that no one should eat their own wrinkle kin. This might seem appalling to approximately while beingness a being of anothers culture. Didion says that morality has the most potentially workforcedacious meaning. (159) And I couldnt agree more. There is a very thin line between right and wrong, and morality is what shows one where to draw it. But the flat coat of that line is so ambiguous, that populate end up using morality to cover up their actions.The idea Didion presents is t hat gentleman are not equipped to distinguish between the good and the bad. We think that all actions are sound as long as they dont endure another person. But then we see tidy sum like Adolf Hitler. The man off millions of people. Yet, he had a bunch of supporters who helped him with these unkind acts. But he did what he did in the name of morality, in the name of respect for the greater race. The central idea of this essay is that morality depends largely on perception. What one finds wrong may not collectfully be seen as inappropriate by another.I followed my own conscience. I did what I thought was right. Didion questions the reader how many madmen consume said this and meant it? Didion doesnt believe that these men shelter themselves under the illusion of morality but actually believe their actions are moral and justified. Maybe we ourselves have said it before and been wrong. Our conscience isnt everlastingly the best judge of things. But the fancy of morality make s it okay to just be impulsive and do what we think is determine in the moment. The relevance of our logic lacks frequency. nonpareil might not kill people on a daily basis but one might find it moral to do it someday and go ahead with it. Does this make them immoral? Is the act of killing immoral? What if the victim is a killer? The answers to questions relating to morality are not black or white. There could be various different instances where individuals might have different stands on issues. All of which they might believe to be morally correct. So the question is, who decides what is moral and what is not? What gives them the post to do so? Should the morality of one person be forced on another?Clearly, universal standards of right and wrong do not exist. The evidence Didion provided as well as instances we see around the world proves that fact. A lot of people do not agree with Didions idea of differing morality. The people who adhere themselves to a supposedly universal mo ral inscribe can delude themselves into thinking people who do not follow that enroll are less humane. People need to stop fretting over moral absolutes and let morality run their life and printing every decision they make in order to ensure the future is near from oppression and terrorism.